The US and the World

US and the World

Issues and Concerns

I have about how the US is dealing with the rest of the world.


biggest role. I just attended a seminar on this last weekend. The number of people who get their news from the paper or radio is miniscule compared to

people getting their news from TV. And, with the rise of the conglomerate, the quality of TV reporting has plummeted. It is amazing what is not covered

on TV news despite the ready availability of it. They are not paying reporters to be independent; they don't like to do stories that tell the truth

because they are afraid of being sued. I no longer watch American news networks with the exception of ABC since the coverage and slant make it

impossible to get facts out of them. Instead, they pass off commentary as news. Just the other day, I saw an interview with John Kerry and Novack was

asking him about Michael Moore's comment at the Clark Rally. And, his producer let that question air. The only purpose that that question served was

to promote the concept that the Moore comment was out of line and untrue. Novack wasn't interested in interviewing Kerry or helping us the people of

America get to learn about him and his ideas and opinions. Funny, they have 24 hours to fill; you would think they could do something a little more in

depth and on the subject instead of allowing a partisan to inject the sound bite of the day onto the airwaves yet another time. The same problem is

occurring with Dean. If you watch the Dean Scream as it is being called, it is clear he was not upset, and was simply trying to rally his troops after a

disappointment. Yet, the spin that he was out of control and angry was the story, and no American TV news network bothered to take the other networks to

task about their obviously slanderous spin on the story. And then we wonder why the American people still don't believe that Bush lied to us about

IRAQ despite the fact and supporting evidence that they did. Why, because if they ran that story as anything other then someone else making an

allegation with the tone that it is inappropriate to point this out, they will get sued. And, they don't even have the guts to take the hit and stop

his tyranny over what and how they report. The problem I have been mulling is despite my feelings on the subject, how best could a valid candidate

manipulate this fear of loosing profits bias that the media has right now? If a candidate does not figure this out, they will not be able to reach the

mass of people who get their news from this medium that no longer cares to report the facts to the people.


AMERICAN? The values we hold. Our compassion for people all across the world.

Too often our

public policy is not made in the best interest of the people. This occurs for many reasons. Sometime politicians are too busy keeping their job to do

their job. Other times, we allow the smallest most annoying segment of our society dictate to the rest of us their prejudices because we don't want

to offend them by telling them their ideas are not only stupid, but also prejudiced. (I have an obligation to be intolerant of intolerance.) Sometimes I

think we get bad information, or don't want to deal with reality in a constructive way. We should not stop our forward progress to a peaceful and

just society just because a small number of petty people don't want to go with us. We need to create a society where everyone has equal opportunity

and equal rights, and not even give any time or credence to people who argue to the contrary. They are wrong, prejudiced, and petty, we should not be

allowing these people to dictate our public policy.

We should be a

leader and encourage the formation of a global government as we the people of this planet are struggling without one. All opposition to global

governance is a misguided attempt to turn back the clock. The nation state has gone the way of the city-state. It still has a role to play but is

inadequate to the problems our planet faces. As I see it, we can either be involved in creating a just and peaceful global society, or we can do what we

are doing now, and stick our head in the sands and be shocked as the world passes us by. America has a lot to offer. We are the country that managed to

get it right by shaking off the chains of religious persecution, and envisioning a society where everyone has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit

of happiness. We are the country that everyone else tries to emulate because our society is the freest. We should not abandon our vision of a peaceful

and just society because a small segment of our society is scared of the world we find ourselves in. The debate over whether we should embrace globalism

is pointless. We live in a global society and are currently dealing with the negative effects of not having an effective system of global governance. If

we don't develop a system of global governance soon, the people of this planet will continue to needlessly suffer because of our


Presidential Promises

Campaign Promises

My Five Most

Important Campaign Promises (from the American Candidate questionaire (2004))


(i) AS PRESIDENT I PROMISE TO: Uphold the wall of separation between church and state, which is essential to maintain our freedom of

religion or belief.

Engage America in the global community and regain our position as a leader in

creating a peaceful and just society.

Send important treaties to the senate for ratification. For far too

long we have signed international treaties and not encouraged our congress to ratify them. Some of these are important and by not ratifying these

treaties, we loose our ability to influence global politics. My first priority will be the ratification of the International Convention on the Rights of

the Child.

Find a solution to the health care crisis Americans are facing. We need to figure out how to

fulfill the promise of Health Care as a Human Right will maintaining the innovation that comes from health care being a commodity. This is one of the

most important issues facing our country and so far, we have not been able to come up with an effective solution.


Re-instate environmental protections that this administration took away and fully fund the EPA enforcement of existing regulations and give

them back their autonomy they need in order to properly protect Americans from environmental hazards.



44: ABORTION: While I personally

have not had one and am grateful I was never in a situation where I would have to make such a difficult choice. I staunchly defend a woman's right

to choose what happens to her body. People, who seek to prevent a woman from having an abortion if she makes that decision, have basically decided that

they have the right to force motherhood on her. That to me is akin to slavery. Having been pregnant I can attest to just how much it takes from a body,

and to force that on someone who is not ready for that commitment, let alone the commitment of raising the child, is cruel. To be pregnant is to give up

your body and your life to another person (your baby). If you are not ready, or not in a financial situation to handle this, etc, it can be a

devastating blow from which a woman and her family might never recover. The wonderful part of living in the modern world is that we have the ability to

plan when and if to have a family. Abortion is a tool of last resort in our ability to plan our families, but a necessary one. Planning is central to

financial health. No one has a right to interfere with the decisions that a woman makes on behalf of herself and her family.

See also Essays in My thoughts

My Choice

Choice is Key

Gay Rights

Gay Marriage

45: GAY MARRIAGE Despite

religious claims to the contrary. Marriage is a secular institution regulated by the state (not the church.) It didn't use to be that way, but it is

now. As a secular institution, marriage is essentially a legal contract between 2 individuals who have agreed to form a financial partnership and not

sleep with anyone else. If our partner fails to live up to the terms of this contract, we have the legal right to sue them for breech of contract. I can

see no legitimate reason for the state to arbitrarily prohibit 2 people from entering into such a contract. I am in support of gay marriage and think

that people who oppose such unions are bigots. Getting married was the best thing I have ever done. And, I can't imagine preventing people from

enjoying the many benefits that a legal marriage provides to a relationship. That being said, if any church is opposed to gay marriage for religious

reasons, I would support their right to not perform such unions. But I can see no reason why we should allow people with such religious views prevent

people who don't share their religious views from entering into such a civil contract. Freedom of religion doesn't mean freedom to force your

religion on others. Another way to explain this conflict is to imagine that there is a religion out there that says marriage is a sacred institution

between 2 men. If we prevent 2 men from entering into marriage, then we are we are prohibiting their free exercise of religion. This is why it is

inappropriate to legislate based on religious beliefs. It always causes religious discrimination, which is prohibited by our bill of rights.

Race Relations

Race Relations


(INCLUDING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND INTERRACIAL DATING/MARRIAGE) We still have way too many bigots in our country, in all the races. As my father always

said, no group corner's the market on stupidity. I have dated interracially on several occasions. And see no problem with it. Then again, I did go

to college in Hawaii, where hapas are the most desired individuals and so, people seek interracial relationships in order for their kids to be hapa.

Being a Humanist, my primary affiliation is with the Human family. I don't subscribe to any tribal affiliations (race being a type of tribal

affiliation). Imagine what the world would be like if our first affiliation was as humans, or as earthlings, and not just Americans, or


For further information –  see my essay on this topic:



The Death Penalty

Death Penalty


am opposed to the death penalty and view it as a human rights abuse. It is time for us to abolish this barbaric practice and join the civilized world.

At the minimum, we should stop executing juvenile offenders and make good on the promises made in the International Convention on the Rights of the


Gun Control

Gun Control

49: GUN CONTROL I am for it, there

should be more of it. If you have a legitimate use for a gun, you have no problem waiting for a proper background check. Additionally, there are weapons

that should be more closely regulated, and tracked.



50: IMMIGRATION: I agree with

Thomas Jefferson on this. I don't believe that there should be restrictions on where people live and make their living. If there are jobs in one

country and not in another, people should be free to immigrate. Preventing migration through limits and other criteria prohibits people from competing

in the global marketplace. I view the current international prohibitions on immigration to be in direct violation of Article 13 Section 2 of the

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states: " Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his

country. And, Article 15 Section 2 "No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality, nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Preventing immigration causes immense suffering. The biggest example of this is China preventing North Koreans from crossing the border. The food

situation is so desolate in North Korea that human flesh has entered the market. Yet, there is plenty of food across the border in China. But China is

preventing people from coming across the border. Their concern is legitimate, because the influx that would come over it China allowed it, would put a

strain on the existing social support network. Any society has problems integrating large numbers of people. Until work can be secured, they are

completely dependant on the welfare of others. This is the same whether it is North Koreans entering China or Georgians entering Florida. Yet, Georgians

are free to move to any state in the union to seek better conditions, but North Koreans are not. A whole new view of this issue needs to be


The Environment



healthy environment is necessary to human health. We cannot be separated from the ecosystem that supports us, and like all organisms, by living, we make

our habitat uninhabitable. However, because we are humans and have the capacity and the unique ability to alter our environment and if we put our mind

to it, we will be able to beat the system so to speak. This will only be accomplished if the majority of the humans agree that it is necessary for our

survival and therefore an economic necessity. Belief systems that deny evolution, and think that god favors humans above other species (ie: human

superiority), are the main problem in moving forward with true environmental reform.

The Economy

The Economy

52: THE ECONOMY: Read Das

Kapital: from Marx and "The Road to Serfdom" by FA Hayuk, add "The Mystery of Capital" by Desoto, and you will know exactly how I

think an economy should be run. Additionally, I believe that the markets and business environment in this country react to tone set by the

CEO/President. If the president is optimistic, the market is. If the president is pessimistic (as W is), the markets are


See book in progress – dialectic between Marx and Hayek

For a preview – see essay: